Tamar Christina
2018-07-11 12:39:18 UTC
Hi All,
The current SYS_EXIT has a bug that when making the call it always uses
the v2 calling convention. This is undefined behavior according to the
semihosting specification:
https://developer.arm.com/docs/100863/latest/semihosting-operations/sys_exit-0x18
This patch fixes it by making sure v1 passes the argument directly in the register instead
of in a block. And for v2 it does the same if the v2 extension isn't supported.
The sequence generated now is
12424: ebfffecd bl 11f60 <_has_ext_exit_extended>
12428: e3500000 cmp r0, #0
1242c: 11a0500d movne r5, sp
12430: 059d5000 ldreq r5, [sp]
12434: e1a00004 mov r0, r4
12438: e1a01005 mov r1, r5
1243c: ef00f000 svc 0x0000f000
Cross compiled arm-none-eabi and regtested using check-gcc and no regressions.
Ok for master?
PS. I do not have commit rights so if OK can someone apply for me?
Thanks,
Tamar
The current SYS_EXIT has a bug that when making the call it always uses
the v2 calling convention. This is undefined behavior according to the
semihosting specification:
https://developer.arm.com/docs/100863/latest/semihosting-operations/sys_exit-0x18
This patch fixes it by making sure v1 passes the argument directly in the register instead
of in a block. And for v2 it does the same if the v2 extension isn't supported.
The sequence generated now is
12424: ebfffecd bl 11f60 <_has_ext_exit_extended>
12428: e3500000 cmp r0, #0
1242c: 11a0500d movne r5, sp
12430: 059d5000 ldreq r5, [sp]
12434: e1a00004 mov r0, r4
12438: e1a01005 mov r1, r5
1243c: ef00f000 svc 0x0000f000
Cross compiled arm-none-eabi and regtested using check-gcc and no regressions.
Ok for master?
PS. I do not have commit rights so if OK can someone apply for me?
Thanks,
Tamar