Use _LDBL_EQ_DBL in nexttowardf.c

[Tom de Vries]

Hi,

quoting from here ( https://sourceware.org/ml/newlib/2014/msg00688.html ):
...

Drop the FORCE_EVAL macro, and wrap nexttowardf in _LDBL_EQ_DBL as

per > Craig's suggestion.
...

Actually, the patch that Jon submitted there is the same as before, and
is missing those changes.

The commit does contain those changes, except that it uses the
non-existing macro _LDBL_EQ_DOUBLE instead of _LDBL_EQ_DBL.

This patch fixes that.

OK?

[ Found this by running into a link error "unresolved symbol
nexttowardf" for gcc testcase gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/nextafter-2.c using
the standalone nvptx toolchain. ]

Thanks,
- Tom

[Jeff Johnston]

Patch applied.

-- Jeff J.

Post by Tom de Vries
Hi,
...

Drop the FORCE_EVAL macro, and wrap nexttowardf in _LDBL_EQ_DBL as per >

Craig's suggestion.
...
Actually, the patch that Jon submitted there is the same as before, and is
missing those changes.
The commit does contain those changes, except that it uses the
non-existing macro _LDBL_EQ_DOUBLE instead of _LDBL_EQ_DBL.
This patch fixes that.
OK?
[ Found this by running into a link error "unresolved symbol nexttowardf"
for gcc testcase gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/nextafter-2.c using the standalone
nvptx toolchain. ]
Thanks,
- Tom